The Rights of Transgender People in Washington State: Discrimination and Harassment

This guide is designed to help transgender individuals understand their legal rights in Washington State.

It is not meant to provide legal advice.

The current legal system assumes individuals identify as one gender, either male or female. While this guide provides an understanding of the current legal system, the ACLU recognizes that many people do not identify as male or female. A person may identify or express as a specific gender, both genders, or neither gender.

The law in this area changes frequently. This guide is current as of June 2022.
 

DISCRIMINATION & HARASSMENT    
      

Are there laws that prohibit discrimination against transgender people?

 
Yes. State and federal laws prohibit discrimination against transgender people in many circumstances.
 

How does Washington law prohibit discrimination against transgender people?

 
Our state anti-discrimination law, known as the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), explicitly prohibits discrimination  because of “gender expression or identity,” [1]  including actual or perceived identity.
This protection  includes, but is not limited to, protection from discrimination in the following areas:
  • Places of public accommodation (i.e., places that serve the public), including restaurants, hotels, and public schools; [2]
  • Housing, including the renting, buying, and selling of homes;[3]
  • Employment, specifically in state, municipal, and private workplaces with eight or more employees;[4]
  • Credit transactions, including loans and credit cards;[5] and
  • Insurance transactions, including health insurance.[6]
 

Washington law also protects people from:

  • Violence and threats motivated by gender expression or actual or perceived gender identity,[7] and
  • Student-on-student harassment, intimidation, and bullying motivated by gender expression or actual or perceived gender identity in public schools.[8]
Some cities (Burien,[9] Olympia,[10] Seattle,[11] and Tacoma[12]) and one County (King[13]) have also passed local laws prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity and expression.
 

What does “gender expression or identity” mean under the law in Washington?

As defined under WLAD, “gender expression or identity” means “having or being perceived as having a gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior, or expression, whether or not that gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior, or expression is different from that traditionally associated with the sex assigned to that person at birth.”[14]  Under this definition, transgender individuals are protected by WLAD from discrimination based on their transgender status.[15]


How does federal law prohibit discrimination against transgender people?

 



Charged with enforcing the WLAD, the Washington State Human Rights Commission (HRC) works to prevent and eliminate discrimination by investigating civil rights complaints and providing education and training opportunities throughout Washington. For information on how to file a formal complaint with the HRC, call 1-800-233-3247 or visit www.hum.wa.gov
 
Two federal laws (Title VII and Title IX) have been interpreted by the courts and federal agencies to protect against discrimination based on gender identity in some settings.   

Employment:  Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sex in employment. In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.[16] In response, the Biden Administration issued an executive order in January 2021 directing federal agencies to adapt their policies, regulations, existing orders, and programs to the court’s decision.[17]
 
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination provisions under Title VII, issued a fact sheet explaining the Supreme Court case and highlighting their previous decisions prohibiting discrimination against transgender employees.[18]
 
Housing: In February 2021, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) interpreted the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.[19]
 
Federally Funded Education Programs: Title IX prohibits discrimination based on sex in educational programs that receive federal funding. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a memo concluding that Title IX prohibits discrimination based on gender identity.[20]  Similarly, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) issued a memo confirming that Title IX prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.[21]
 
Although these federal agencies have implemented the executive order to protect transgender individuals, lawsuits have already been filed challenging protections for transgender people under Title IX.  This area of law should be monitored for any additional developments.
 
Hate crimes:  The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act allows the federal government to assist state and local authorities in the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes motivated by bias against a person’s gender identity or expression.[22]
 

Does the U.S. Constitution protect transgender people from discrimination?

 
Yes. While federal laws (Title VII and Title IX as discussed above) include protections for transgender people, there are also protections under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts have recognized that discrimination on the basis of transgender identity violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, [23] because sex  discrimination encompasses discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression. In 2020, the Fourth Circuit recognized that the Fourteenth Amendment protects transgender students from discriminatory bathroom policies.[24] 
 
In addition, the First Amendment, which bars the government from censoring speech or expression, protects people’s right to dress (an important form of personal expression) in a way that is consistent with their gender identity. Furthermore, the Due Process Clause likely recognizes and protects individuals’ interests in determining and expressing their gender through personal appearance and mannerisms.
 

Does the law protect a transgender person’s right to use the restroom consistent with their gender identity?

 
Yes. WLAD specifically protects against discrimination in employment and places of public accommodation, including
public schools, based on one’s gender expression or identity.[25]  The Washington State Human Rights Commission (HRC) — the state agency responsible for enforcing the WLAD — issued regulations in 2015 clarifying that the WLAD protects the right of transgender individuals to use restrooms and other gender-segregated facilities consistent with their gender identity[26].
 
The Washington state Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) also issued guidelines to school districts recognizing the rights of transgender students to use restrooms consistent with gender identity. These guidelines, which relate to the elimination of discrimination in public schools, state that school districts should allow students to use the restrooms “consistent with their gender identity consistently asserted at school.”[27] The guidelines also state that any student who has a need or desire for increased privacy should be provided access to an alternative restroom, such as a staff or health office restroom, but that no student should be required to use a private restroom or a restroom inconsistent consistent with their gender identity just because they are transgender or gender nonconforming.[28]
 
Federal agencies have previously determined that federal civil rights law protects a transgender person’s right to use restrooms and other gender-segregated facilities consistent with their gender identity in education programs that receive federal financial assistance (i.e., public schools and some private schools).[29] The federal courts have also recognized the right to use restrooms consistent with gender identity in federally funded education programs.[30]
 

Are there laws that specifically protect transgender students from harassment?

 
Yes. Washington law protects transgender students in public schools from discrimination, intimidation, bullying, and harassment.[31] Additionally, the WLAD and the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) require public school officials to allow transgender students to wear clothing that matches their gender identity (including at proms),[32] call transgender students by the student’s chosen name and pronoun,[33] provide transgender students with access to safe and appropriate restrooms and locker rooms (or appropriate alternative places in which to change for gym class) and accommodate transgender athletes.[34] For transgender students participating in interscholastic athletics in public schools, OSPI regulations direct school districts to follow the policies of the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA), which state that students should be allowed to participate in physical education and athletic activities in a manner that is consistent with their gender identity.[35]


If you are being harassed, intimidated, or bullied in school, keep a record of each incident and report them to your principal or counselor. To talk to someone outside of your school or to get more information on strategies to stop harassment, call the Safe Schools Coalition at 1-877-723-3723 or visit www.safeschoolscoalition.org
 


It is the ACLU’s position that discrimination or harassment directed at transgender students in public schools may violate the Equal Protection Clause of the federal Constitution, which would require schools to  protect transgender students from harassment on an equal basis with all other students; the First Amendment, which we believe protects the right of students to dress in accordance with their gender expression or identity; and the  Due Process Clause, which we believe protects students’ liberty interest in their personal appearance. 

ACLU OF WASHINGTON

The American Civil Liberties Union of Washington is a nonprofit, nonpartisan membership organization devoted to protecting the civil liberties of all people in Washington and extending rights to groups that historically have been denied equal treatment.
 
As one of the ACLU’s more than 50 local affiliates around the U.S., the ACLU of Washington works for equal rights and legal protections against discrimination and harassment for the LGBTQIA2S+ community through litigation and legal advocacy, lobbying at the state legislature and local governments, and public education. The ACLU of Washington does not address problems that arise outside of the state of Washington.
 
The ACLU of Washington offers information in response to specific inquiries or concerns, suggestions on how to assert individual rights and engage in advocacy; provides referrals to other organizations better able to offer such information or advice in specific situations; and in some instances, undertakes impact litigation (i.e., pursues lawsuits that will defend or extend fundamental civil liberties and civil rights that will affect a large number of people).
 
If you feel you have been the victim of discrimination based on your gender expression or identity, please consider contacting the ACLU of Washington in one of the following ways:
 
  • Online: Submit a request for help online by visiting www.aclu-wa.org/help
  • By phone: Call the ACLU of Washington’s Information and Referral Program at 206.624.2180 (open Tuesday through Thursday, 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.).
  • By mail: Write to American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, P.O. Box 2728, Seattle, WA 98111 and provide the following information: your name, mailing address, telephone number and e-mail address (if available); a brief description of the problem or issue about which you are contacting the ACLU of Washington, including any relevant dates and the names of any individuals or organizations involved; a description or copy of any relevant documentation; whether you are presently represented by an attorney in the matter you are writing about; whether you have taken any steps to resolve the matter you are writing about and, if so, a description of these steps; and a description of what you would like the ACLU of Washington to do concerning this matter.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES                       

 
For additional resources and information about transgender rights, please see:
 
[1] Revised Code of Wash. (RCW) 49.60.040(26).
[2] RCW 49.60.030(1)(b); RCW 49.60.040(2), (14); RCW 49.60.215.
[3] RCW 49.60.040(22) to (23)
[4] RCW 49.60.030(1)(a); RCW 49.60.040(11); RCW 49.60.180
[5] RCW 49.60.030(1)(d); RCW 49.60.040(6); RCW 49.60.176
[6] RCW 49.60.030(1)(e); RCW 49.60.178.
[7] RCW 9A.36.080 (malicious harassment); see also 9A.36.080(6)(a) (which imports the definition of “sexual orientation” used in RCW 49.60).
[8] RCW 28A.600.477
[11] SEATTLE, WASH., MUN. CODE § 14.04 (employment); SEATTLE, WASH., MUN. CODE
§ 14.06 (public accommodations); SEATTLE, WASH., MUN. CODE § 14.08 (housing); SEATTLE, WASH., MUN. CODE § 14.10 (contracting); SEATTLE, WASH., MUN. CODE § 18.12
(parks), (available at https://library.municode.com/wa/seattle/codes/municipal_code).
[13] King County (barring discrimination in places of public accommodation KCC 12.22, housing KCC 12.20, and employment KCC 12.18), https://kingcounty.gov/council/legislation/kc_code.aspx
[14] RCW 49.60.040(27)
[15] Washington State Human Rights Commission, Guide to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and the Washington Law Against Discrimination, hum.wa.gov,  https://www.hum.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/publications/Updated%20SO%20GI%20Guide.pdf).
[16] See Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S.Ct. 1731 (2020).
[17] See The White House Briefing Room, Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation, whitehouse.gov, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-preventing-and-combating-discrimination-on-basis-of-gender-identity-or-sexual-orientation/
[18] U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Protections Against Employment Based on Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, eeoc.gov, https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/protections-against-employment-discrimination-based-sexual-orientation-or-gender
[19] U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD to Enforce Fair Housing Act to Prohibit Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, hud.gov,  https://www.hud.gov/press/press_releases_media_advisories/HUD_No_21_021  
[20] U.S. Dep’t of  Justice Civil Rights Division, Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Title IX of hte Education Amendments of 1972, justice.gov, https://www.justice.gov/crt/page/file/1383026/download.  The memo analyzed the text of Title IX, the Bostock case and subsequent cases in two appellate courts: Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board, 976 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S.Ct. 2878 (2021) and Adams v. Sch. Brd. Of St. Johns Cnty., 3 F.4th 1299 (11th Cir. 2020), reh’g en banc granted, No. 18-13592, 2021 3722168 (2021).
[21] U.S. Dep’t of Education, U.S. Department of Education Confirms Title IX Protects Students from Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, ed.gov,  https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-confirms-title-ix-protects-students-discrimination-based-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity
[22] Hate Crime Acts, 18 U.S.C. § 249 (2012).
[23] See Glenn v. Brumby, 663 F.3d 1312, 1317 (11th Cir. 2011).
[24] See Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board, 972 F.3d 586 (2020).
[25] Gender identity protections do cover access to gender identity-appropriate restrooms. See RCW 49.60.040(2); Doe v. Reg’l Sch. Unit 26, 86 A.3d 600 (Me. 2014); Mathis v. Fountain-Fort Carson Sch. Dist. 8, State of Colorado, Division of Civil Rights Charge No. P20130034X (Determination June 17, 2013) (available at  http://lgbtqbar.org/annual/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/05/Coy-Mathis-Decision-1.compressed.pdf
[26] See Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 162-32-060.
[27] Susanne Beauchaine et al., Wash. Superintendent of Pub. Instruction, Office of Super- intendent of Pub. Instruction, Prohibiting Discrimination in Washington Public Schools: Guidelines for School Districts to Implement Chapters 28A.640 and 28A.642 RCW and Chapter 392-190 (2012) (available at https://www.k12.wa.us/sites/default/files/public/safetycenter/bullyingharassment/pubdocs/prohibitingdiscriminationpublicschools.pdf)  (hereinafter “OSPI Guidelines”). These guidelines are designed to assist schools in implementing RCW 28A.642 (prohibiting discrimination in Washington public schools based on race, creed, religion, color, national origin, sexual orientation including gender expression or identity, veteran or military status, the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability); RCW 28A.640 (prohibiting discrimination in Washington public schools based on sex); and WAC 392-190 (codifying OSPI’s rules for eliminating discrimination in public school employment, counseling and guidance services for students, recreational and athletic activities, access to course offerings, and in textbooks
and instruction materials). OSPI Guidelines, at 6.
[28] OSPI Guidelines at 30
[29] In 2015, the U.S. Department of Education determined that an Illinois school district violated the federal Title IX law by denying a transgender student access to a gender-appropriate locker room.  See Student A v. Township High Sch. Dist. 211, U.S. Dep’t of Educ. Office of Civil Rights Case No. 05-14-1055 (Nov. 2, 2015)(available at https://www2.ed.gov/documents/press-releases/township-high-211-letter.pdf)
[30] In Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board, 972 F.3d 586 (2020), a transgender student filed a lawsuit in response to the school board refusing to allow him to use the boys’ restroom at his high school. Represented by the ACLU, the student alleged discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause and Title IX. In 2020, the Fourth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the student. The school board requested that the U.S. Supreme Court review the decision, but its request was denied.  A similar case is being decided in the Eleventh Circuit and in their briefing, the DOJ argued that the school board’s bathroom policies violate Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause. See Adams v. Sch. Brd. Of St. Johns Cnty., 3 F.4th 1299 (11th Cir. 2020), reh’g en banc granted, No. 18-13592, 2021 3722168 (2021) AND  https://www.justice.gov/crt/case-document/file/1458461/download  Brief for the DOJ as Amicus Curiae, Adams v. Sch. Brd. Of St. Johns Cnty., 3 F.4th 1299 (11th Cir. 2020), reh’g en banc granted, No. 18-13592, 2021 3722168 (2021)
[31] OSPI Guidelines at 30; RCW 28A.642.010; RCW 28A.642.020.
[32] OSPI Guidelines at 29.
[33] OSPI Guidelines at 30. The OSPI Guidelines state that school districts “should not require proof of medical treatments in order to respect a student’s gender identity or expression.”
[34] For more information, see OSPI Guidelines, supra note 32;
[35] Washington Interscholastic Activities Association Handbook, 2021-2022 (available at http://wiaa.com/results/handbook/2021-22/FullHandbook.pdf  AND Washington Interscholastic Activities Association, Gender Diverse Youth Sport Inclusivity Toolkit, 2021 (available at http://wiaa.com/ConDocs/Con1914/Gender%20Diverse%20Toolkit.pdf), page 8.